However, I don't see how it's a far leap to assume that they wouldn't keep DNA of some of their best soldiers in case one should die.
If they did that, they'd have to raise baby Quaritch clone again from scratch. And Quaritch was valuable cause he had so much experience in war on earth. So they'd have to put the Quaritch clone through, what, 30 years of combat experience all over again, and something could easily go wrong so he wouldn't be the person they want him to be again. What he
is is not stored in his DNA.
There's such a huge supply of humans on overpopulated earth, plenty of which have war experience. It would be much more useful for them to just get a fresh war veteran, already grown up.
And, quite frankly, Quaritch was a bit of a nuissance to them. Especially in that scene that was cut out from the final movie, where he attacked Selfridge and took control. And he continued fighting when the RDA were already defeated. That's not what ya call efficient. I don't really see how Quaritch was in any way of much value to the RDA. He held a high position, so sure, they felt his loss. But he held that high position based on his
experience, not his genes.
IMO it is nice to have a story follow through until the end but if Cameron suddenly decided to change the main characters from Jake and Neytiri to some other Avatar/Na'vi does that suddenly make the movie horrible? I don't believe so, it only makes it different.
It might not be the worst thing in the world, it could still be a nice movie and all, but it would be terrible if it happened. I can safely say it would suck to have them die, even if
maybe the rest of the movie wouldn't suck somehow.
I, just like everybody else, do have opinions about what I like to see in movies. However I don't think it is fair to JC or anybody else working on Avatar 2 to judge if something that they have yet to put into play makes the movie suck without it having been seen or even made for that matter.
I already adressed this. We are
not judging JC, cause he has not said he'd bring Quaritch back. You can't be offended on JC's behalf if we're criticizing something he never even did.
On the contrary: I am guessing that Cameron, too, would possibly consider the idea of bringing Quaritch back a stupid idea if he heard about it. So
you might actually be the one judging him and disagreeing with him.
Obviously we don't know what Cameron thinks about this, so there's no point bringing him into this.
And we also have our opinions, about what would be cool and what would be bad. It really doesn't make a lot of sense that you said we were like the haters, just for voicing negative opinions.
