Someone removed the Na'vi example from the wikipedia article on miratives!

[Eyawng te Klltepayu]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mirative&action=history


Should we revert it? 

[Txantslusam Skxawng]

(Na'vi is a constructed language and does not fit with the other examples in this article.)

[Toruk Makto]

(Na'vi is a constructed language and does not fit with the other examples in this article.)

Sounds like somebody was being a little old school when they committed that edit on Wiki. Just because a language isn't organic doesn't mean it doesn't "fit". IMO, the reference should include any viable language and Na'vi is certainly viable.

EDIT: Looks like the edit was from somebody involved in the Company of Angels repertory theater in Los Angeles. 

[Sіr. Ηaxalot]

(Na'vi is a constructed language and does not fit with the other examples in this article.)

At least they didn't say fake.

['Oma Tirea]

(Na'vi is a constructed language and does not fit with the other examples in this article.)

At least they didn't say fake.

Sran however Wikipedia has a small thing against conlangs for more serious and general topics such as the mirative.

[Txur’Itan]

(Na'vi is a constructed language and does not fit with the other examples in this article.)

At least they didn't say fake.

Sran however Wikipedia has a small thing against conlangs for more serious and general topics such as the mirative.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirative#Na.27vi

[Human No More]

Good work, keep bias out of Wikipedia