Author Topic: Txantsana pxesìsung, kefyak?  (Read 1822 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Prrton

  • Eyktan
  • Palulukan Makto
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 2799
  • Karma: 105
  • Rutxe, fmivi. Ftxey fra'u eyawr fuke, ke tsranten.
    • Pìlok leNa'vi a ro MaSempul.org
Txantsana pxesìsung, kefyak?
« on: March 01, 2010, 06:22:55 pm »

Just a dribble, but...

Quote from: Paul Frommer
Tewti, ma Prrton! Txantsana tìkangkem, txantsana aysäfpìl.

[As you can guess, säfpìl = idea, thought -- sä.FPÌL]

Lu awngar aytele apxay a teri sa'u pivlltxe...

« Teri » does not cause lenition. "Sa'u" is a short plural (short for aysa'u, of course): Literally: We have many matters that (we) may speak about THEM (or: THOSE THINGS)--i.e., we have a lot to talk about.

For the equivalent of "isn't that true?" "¿verdad?" "n'est-ce pas?" etc. let's go with "kefya [ke.FYA] srak?" or, as an equivalent shorter form, "kefyak?" (Derived, as we discussed, from "ke fìfya srak?")


  - säfpìl = idea

  - ..., kefya srak? or just ..., kefyak? = ..., isn't it? ..., right?

  - sa'u (short plural) = those things

'Ivong Na'vi!

Offline Kemaweyan

  • Eywatsyìp
  • ******
  • *
  • Posts: 14675
  • ua Ukraine
  • Karma: 240
  • Swirä letxon
Re: Txantsana pxesìsung, kefyak?
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2010, 06:41:04 pm »
Txantsana fmawn, irayo ;)
Nìrangal frapo tsirvun pivlltxe nìNa'vi :D

Offline Nìwotxkrr Tìyawn

  • Palulukan Makto
  • *****
  • Posts: 1902
  • Karma: 46
  • Watch AVATAR, or I'll find you. ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)
Re: Txantsana pxesìsung, kefyak?
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2010, 07:47:12 pm »
Every little bit helps.  :D
Naruto Shippuden Episode 166: Confession
                                    Watch it, Love it, Live it

Offline Lance R. Casey

  • Eyktan
  • Ikran Makto
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 948
  • se Sweden
  • Karma: 57
  • Man cenuva métim' andúnë?
Re: Txantsana pxesìsung, kefyak?
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2010, 03:10:50 am »
Quote from: Paul Frommer
"Sa'u" is a short plural (short for aysa'u, of course): Literally: We have many matters that (we) may speak about THEM (or: THOSE THINGS)--i.e., we have a lot to talk about.

So there are now no less than three ways to render "those"?

tsahem
tsayhem
(ay)sakem

// Lance R. Casey

Offline roger

  • Taronyu
  • ****
  • Posts: 724
  • Karma: 22
Re: Txantsana pxesìsung, kefyak?
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2010, 03:24:56 am »
Are all three attested on the same root? I wonder if the difference is that ca- is considered a prefix on -kem, but not in the case of ca'u. Might correspond w stress: in cakem, it is kem that is stressed and takes the plural; in ca'u, it is ca- that is stressed and takes the plural.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2010, 03:27:16 am by roger »

Offline Lance R. Casey

  • Eyktan
  • Ikran Makto
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 948
  • se Sweden
  • Karma: 57
  • Man cenuva métim' andúnë?
Re: Txantsana pxesìsung, kefyak?
« Reply #5 on: March 02, 2010, 03:37:49 am »
Are all three attested on the same root? I wonder if the difference is that ca- is considered a prefix on -kem, but not in the case of ca'u. Might correspond w stress: in cakem, it is kem that is stressed and takes the plural; in ca'u, it is ca- that is stressed and takes the plural.

No, they're not. Where has the stress for tsa'u been given? At least in fì'u, Frommer stresses the ultima.

// Lance R. Casey

Offline 'eylan na'viyä

  • Omatikaya
  • ****
  • Posts: 447
  • Karma: 10
Re: Txantsana pxesìsung, kefyak?
« Reply #6 on: March 02, 2010, 04:12:01 am »
Txantsana fmawn !
 :D
thanks for sharing

Offline roger

  • Taronyu
  • ****
  • Posts: 724
  • Karma: 22
Re: Txantsana pxesìsung, kefyak?
« Reply #7 on: March 02, 2010, 04:31:23 am »
Are all three attested on the same root? I wonder if the difference is that ca- is considered a prefix on -kem, but not in the case of ca'u. Might correspond w stress: in cakem, it is kem that is stressed and takes the plural; in ca'u, it is ca- that is stressed and takes the plural.
No, they're not. Where has the stress for tsa'u been given? At least in , Frommer stresses the ultima.

I'm just speculating.

Where do we have the stress of fì'u attested, other than it contracting to fu-?

Offline Lance R. Casey

  • Eyktan
  • Ikran Makto
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 948
  • se Sweden
  • Karma: 57
  • Man cenuva métim' andúnë?
Re: Txantsana pxesìsung, kefyak?
« Reply #8 on: March 02, 2010, 06:04:41 am »
Where do we have the stress of fì'u attested, other than it contracting to fu-?
Tsun oe ngahu pivängkxo a fì'u oeru prrte' lu

// Lance R. Casey

Offline roger

  • Taronyu
  • ****
  • Posts: 724
  • Karma: 22
Re: Txantsana pxesìsung, kefyak?
« Reply #9 on: March 02, 2010, 05:03:52 pm »
thanks!

 

Become LearnNavi's friend on Facebook Follow LearnNavi on Twitter! Watch LearnNavi's videos on YouTube

SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines | XHTML | RSS | WAP2 | Site Rules

LearnNavi is not affiliated with the official Avatar website,
James Cameron, LightStorm Entertainment or The Walt Disney Company.
All trademarks and servicemarks are the properties of their respective owners.
Images in the LearnNavi.org Forums and Gallery may not be used without permission.

LearnNavi Affiliates:
ToS

LearnNavi is the community to learn Na'vi, the Avatar Language
"A place where real friendships are made." -Paul Frommer

AvatarMeet | Learn Na'vi Forum | Learn Na'vi Wiki | Na'viteri

LearnNavi