Dict-na'vi.com report

[Tìtstewan]

See Reply #225
That "bug" is not new.

[Vawmataw]

I bet it answers to my question. It can't be solved or it's very complicated to solve it.

[Tirea Aean]

Those other affixes can be used alone but <us> and <awn> need -a- and since it's not obvious which side that will go on in your sentence, there's not much that can be done besides maybe list both of those forms such as tusarona; atusaron.

It's probably not insane to implement this but it's probably not cake work either

[Tìtstewan]

I have no idea how to suggest a solution for it, because I don't know how the Dict-Na'vi codes work.

[Plumps]

old gallery link?id=6649[/img]
It's an interesting thing....

Your verb can become an adjective by simply adding the affixes -us-, ketsuk- and tsuk-, but adding the adjective particle alone is incorrect.
Is there something we can do?

Thanks for hinting at this again. Will let Tukan know.
I would need to know what you typed in as the searchable word that produced this outcome. Because if you type in lok on its own it doesn't produce that result.

[Tirea Aean]

old gallery link?id=6649[/img]
It's an interesting thing....

Your verb can become an adjective by simply adding the affixes -us-, ketsuk- and tsuk-, but adding the adjective particle alone is incorrect.
Is there something we can do?

Thanks for hinting at this again. Will let Tukan know.
I would need to know what you typed in as the searchable word that produced this outcome. Because if you type in lok on its own it doesn't produce that result.

It does it for both loka and alok for me

[Tìtstewan]

It does for all verbs one write with a, like "atse'a".

[Plumps]

Well that can't be right
Why would you look up such a thing?

No, of course, that's not correct. I'll let Tukan know. Thanks, you guys.

[Tirea Aean]

Could it be that this allowing was done on purpose, so that the user would actually get relevant results (even if they don't make correct sense) instead of No Results, every time they happen to put in something that's not correctly formed?

[Tìtstewan]

Just my speculation: that -a- like "atse'a" could be appear in that search box just because one simply forgot to add <us> / <awn>? Because it would be correct if one search for "atse'<us/awn>a" that will shown as tse'a | <us> or <awn> | -a-

[Tirea Aean]

atsuse'a | tsuse'a
atsawne'a | tsawne'a

Good thing it knows what to do when people get the infix location incorrect.

[Vawmataw]

Is tìomum countable?

[Tirea Aean]

Is tìomum countable?

I wouldn't think so, but I'm not even sure if säomum is or not either.  My guesses are:

Tìomum not countable
Säomum probably countable

[Vawmataw]

Therefore there's a mistake in the dictionary.

[Plumps]

Is tìomum countable?

I wouldn't think so, but I'm not even sure if säomum is or not either.  My guesses are:

Tìomum not countable
Säomum probably countable

säomum is countable (see here)

[Vawmataw]

Definition of fyanyo:
Elevated utalitarian surface


This is a tabel!

[Plumps]

Fixed. Thank you.
I shouldn't do these entries when I'm still under the influence of a jet lag...

[Blue Elf]

Small typo in translation of fekumnga' -> disadventageous. And I was wondering why I can't find translation into Czech for this word

[Plumps]

Thanks. Fixed.

I don't know why that is. I tried the German version and it works. You'd have to speak with Tukan about that.

[Vawmataw]

I don't know why that is. I tried the German version and it works. You'd have to speak with Tukan about that.

Talking to me? I purged my cache and it worked again. I forgot to delete my report.