Dict-na'vi.com report

[Plumps]

No, sorry, I misread Blue Elf's comment and thought he meant something different
Nevermind. Frawzo

[Tirea Aean]

Pxek should be vtr.

[Vawmataw]

Now you should be able to search a word containing an hyphen.

[Plumps]

Not exactly sure what you mean. Srake nga tsun law sivi?

[Vawmataw]

Not exactly sure what you mean. Srake nga tsun law sivi?

Well, one couldn't search words containing an hyphen. The problem is solved.

[Plumps]

For your respected language or in Na'vi? I must admit I hadn't noticed

[Vawmataw]

Probably all languages.

[Vawmataw]

Small mistake in the translation of snäm

(for obejcts and skills)

[Tìtstewan]

Error found in dict-navi IPA: [tʼɛ.ˈʔlan]
Should be [tʼɛʔ.ˈlan]


Thanks to Neytiri

[Plumps]

Irayo nìtxan.
Tsamekeyeyt zosleykolu.

[Blue Elf]

During random search on dict-navi I've found this example sentence:

txo oe kirvä pohu nga, livu nitram ->   If I were going with her you would be happy.

I think that livu should be replaced by 'ivefu - as for inner feelings we use it. Ngay fu tsleng?

[Vawmataw]

During random search on dict-navi I've found this example sentence:

txo oe kirvä pohu nga, livu nitram ->   If I were going with her you would be happy.

I think that livu should be replaced by 'ivefu - as for inner feelings we use it. Ngay fu tsleng?

Ngay.
If it's not from canon texts, I think it should be modified.

[Hahaw[hhvhhvcz]]

During random search on dict-navi I've found this example sentence:

txo oe kirvä pohu nga, livu nitram ->   If I were going with her you would be happy.

I think that livu should be replaced by 'ivefu - as for inner feelings we use it. Ngay fu tsleng?

Ngay.
If it's not from canon texts, I think it should be modified.

There is also typo with comma.

Txo oe kirvä pohu nga, 'ivefu nitram. ->If i were going with her you, feel happy. *
Txo oe kirvä pohu, nga, 'ivefu nitram. -> If i were going with her, you would feel happy.

[Blue Elf]

During random search on dict-navi I've found this example sentence:

txo oe kirvä pohu nga, livu nitram ->   If I were going with her you would be happy.

I think that livu should be replaced by 'ivefu - as for inner feelings we use it. Ngay fu tsleng?

Ngay.
If it's not from canon texts, I think it should be modified.

There is also typo with comma.

Txo oe kirvä pohu nga, 'ivefu nitram. ->If i were going with her you, feel happy. *
Txo oe kirvä pohu, nga, 'ivefu nitram. -> If i were going with her, you would feel happy.

YES! I felt there's something strange there, but couldn't see it!

[Blue Elf]

To is marked as conjunction, what is not correct. It is particle, which behaves like adposition

[Blue Elf]

Another strange things:
natkenong:  main dict = conj., dict navi = adv.
zel:  main dict = adv., dict navi = conj. (Naviteri says nothing...)

So what is correct?

[Plumps]

To is marked as conjunction, what is not correct. It is particle, which behaves like adposition

Corrected. Thanks.

The other ones. I don't know.

If we apply the parallel structure from txo/tsakrr to zun/zel then it should be conj./adv. but that only works because tsakrr works as an adverb in other situations. Zun/zel don't have other meanings of their own. So for me that calls for either conj. or even particle.

[Vawmataw]

We can read that pawm is intransitive. However, pawm can also be transitive.

[Blue Elf]

We can read that pawm is intransitive. However, pawm can also be transitive.

In main dictionary it is marked just as verb....

[Vawmataw]

http://naviteri.org/2011/08/reported-speech-reported-questions/

With pawm as with plltxe, there are both transitive and intransitive structures.