Exercise sheets for beginners

Started by Ftxavanga Txe′lan, November 25, 2010, 07:26:13 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ftxavanga Txe′lan

Kaltxì! :D

Following Tirea Aean's suggestion, I've decided to transcribe the little exercises I've built for my own Na'vi learning on computer and put them on the forum, in case they'd be useful for some fellow learners. :) They're very basic, and it's also possible that there's mistakes (please tell me if you see some!), but I hope you're going to appreciate the lessons anyways. :D Feel free to tell me how you like them!

I've done three lessons up to now, and I might also continue doing other ones in the future. ;D
Note: The docs contain mostly regular exercises, which are in black. Furthermore, I had written many conclusions and summaries in my own activity book among the exercises, and I thought I could add these as tips. I put them in a paler colour though, so that people who don't want to get any help and want to work all by themselves can avoid looking at the tips. :D

.DOC FORMAT

First Lesson - Pronouns & Posession
Second Lesson - Plural, Doing an Action & Nouning
Third Lesson - Cases & Vocabulary *mip

.RTF.PAGES FORMAT

First Lesson - Pronouns & Posession
Second Lesson - Plural, Doing an Action & Nouning
Third Lesson - Cases & Vocabulary *mip

TO DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENTS

Once you get on the download page, click on 'click here', as showed on this screencap. Please tell me if you're not able to download. :)
CORRECTIONS

Tanks to Sä'nek for the help :)

First exercise sheet

1) Pronouns

2) Possession

Second exercise sheet

1) Plural (single words)

2) Plural (sentences)

3) Doing an action

4) Nouning

Third exercise sheet

1) Cases

2) Na'vi to English phrases/expressions

3) English to Na'vi phrases/expressions

4) Translation of single words

~

28/11 UPDATE: Third exercise is up, minor modifications have been done to the previous documents (which have been re-uploaded), and correction has been completed and given new precisions/details. :)

Mako

Even though you did create them on a Mac, it will not open on mine (.pages is an unrecognized filetype). Perhaps I could suggest saving them in .rtf or .docx format so that Mac and PC users can open them?

Ftxavanga Txe′lan

Thanks for the information, ma Sä'nek. :)

Well, I tried saving my documents in .rtf and .docx format as you suggested, but in both cases it didn't work. It says something like: "You cannot save this document with extension ".rtf" at the end of the name. The required extension is ".pages"." I was able to save the docs as rtf.pages though.

I also found a way to save the files in a .doc format. Don't know if it's going to work, either. I edited the first post with both new file formats, hopefully it works fine this time, either way. :D

Mako

#3
Downloading...

.doc works perfectly. Only problem is you got the headers mixed up up there so the .rtf.pages are actually the .doc and vice versa ;)

Ftxavanga Txe′lan

Quote from: Sä'nek on November 26, 2010, 12:40:12 PM
Downloading...

.doc works perfectly. Only problem is you got the headers mixed up up there so the .rtf.pages are actually the .doc and vice versa ;)

Great!! ;D Yes, I just saw the headers were mixed up and edited them ;) Irayo :)

In your case, considering your number of messages, I guess the documents really can't be of any help, but I hope it will be useful to some people of my level. :D

Mako

#5
Even still I'm running through them. I can't remember all of the rules for lenition :O But I think I've got this. Perhaps you should post the answers in a spoiler in the first post?

Ftxavanga Txe′lan

Yes, that's a good idea! I'm probably going to post the answers this weekend, along with the third document that's in the process :)

Mako

#7
Here are what should be the correct answers:

Exercise 1 (Part 2):

Exercise 2 (Part 1):

Exercise 2 (Part 2):

Please, correct me if I'm wrong. Also, I noticed a spot that an accent is missing. Nothing too major though.

Nyx

#8
Great stuff :D I've got some suggestions, they're in the spoiler, just in case they might be giving stuff away. Oh also, if you're looking for something that should work for everyone, I'd suggest .pdf



edit: just clarifying, this is on the exercise sheets, not Sä'nek's solutions

Hufwe Atxur

Looks good, sìltsan - I'll try it out later. Works perfect here under Win/XP with OpenOffice.
old gallery link?id=1630.jpg[/img]
NEW version of Seed of Language released! Click on the banner to find out more!

Ftxavanga Txe′lan

Thank you Nyx! I've done the corrections you've suggested and uploaded the new documents (in which I've done other little modifications). :)

Irayo for the corrections, ma Sä'nek! I have put yours and the ones missing in the first post. I wrote some stuff in red as well: that's what I had written in my exercise book (which might me incorrect). I'd really appreciate if someone would check and tell me if it makes sense. :D

Glad to see your comment, Hufwe Atxur! ;D

Mako

#11
Yeah. Let me get downstairs and I'll explain why some of what's in red is wrong.

Section 2:

Section 1:

Section 2:

Anything I didn't cover is right. My mistakes. Didn't see the doing an action and nouning so I'm doing those really quick ;)

Ftxavanga Txe′lan

Thank you so much again, your help is truly helpful ;D I arranged everything in the first post again, so now it should be fine for people to correct the exercises :)

'Oma Tirea

Quote from: Sä'nek on November 26, 2010, 01:00:32 PM
Here are what should be the correct answers:

Exercise 1 (Part 2):

Exercise 2 (Part 1):

Exercise 2 (Part 2):

Please, correct me if I'm wrong. Also, I noticed a spot that an accent is missing. Nothing too major though.

Corrected.  Typo fixes are in "Eywa Purple" ;)

Also, if you are thinking of teaching the posessive (genitive) case for the first set of excercises, you might want to devise some other ways, because the above examples are perfect for the topical case.

[img]http://swokaikran.skxawng.lu/sigbar/nwotd.php?p=2b[/img]

ÌTXTSTXRR!!

Srake serar le'Ìnglìsìa lì'fyayä aylì'ut?  Nari si älofoniru rutxe!!

Ftxavanga Txe′lan

Quote from: Sxkxawng alu 'Oma Tirea on November 27, 2010, 11:00:55 PM
Quote from: Sä'nek on November 26, 2010, 01:00:32 PM
Here are what should be the correct answers:

Exercise 1 (Part 2):

Exercise 2 (Part 1):

Exercise 2 (Part 2):

Please, correct me if I'm wrong. Also, I noticed a spot that an accent is missing. Nothing too major though.

Corrected.  Typo fixes are in "Eywa Purple" ;)

Also, if you are thinking of teaching the posessive (genitive) case for the first set of excercises, you might want to devise some other ways, because the above examples are perfect for the topical case.



Concerning Exercise 2 Part 2, would you say the corrections I've made would make sense, too?

You didn't apply lenition - is it because you had no prefix before the nouns? In this case, I guess I should change my way to present things, because what I've written pretty much implies that if we decide to remove the prefix, the noun after it is still going to be lenited, right? I should perhaps do this:

As for the prefixes -me and -pxe not being optional, I fixed that in my corrections. :)

Concerning another way to teach the genitive, what do you exactly suggest? I'm not sure to understand what you mean. :) Is the topical case not in relation to another sentence, when we want to tell what happened to a particular pronoun in this concern ("as for")? Then I wouldn't really see how my three instances in Exercise 1 Part 2 would be perfect for that. If I'd explain the topical case, shouldn't I rather use sets of two sentences going together or something? Well, I'm just saying that, in fact I don't know really ahah. What do you think? :)

Anyways, thank you very much for your help, ma 'eylan! ;D

Carborundum

To my knowledge, Frommer has not given a ruling on how to predicate dual/trial nouns to other nouns/pronouns. That is, we don't yet know if sentences such as "moe lu karyu" and "moe lu haryu" are correct. The only format that is truly safe is making sure all plural prefixes agree, as in "moe lu meharyu", so I strongly recommend going with that.

Also, *unìltirantokx should be uniltìrantokx.
We learn from our mistakes only if we are made aware of them.
If I make a mistake, please bring it to my attention for karma.

Ftxavanga Txe′lan

Thank you for the infos, ma Carborundum! ˆˆ I incorporated that to the first post.

'Oma Tirea

Quote from: Ftxavanga Txe′lan on November 28, 2010, 07:17:45 AM
Concerning Exercise 2 Part 2, would you say the corrections I've made would make sense, too?

You didn't apply lenition - is it because you had no prefix before the nouns? In this case, I guess I should change my way to present things, because what I've written pretty much implies that if we decide to remove the prefix, the noun after it is still going to be lenited, right? I should perhaps do this:

According to NiaN, they're both right, just so long as you don't use ay+ with something that's not prefixed with ay+.  That said, I think the split format ('emyu/pxemyu) is great.  Also, because s doesn't lenite, you're going to need the ay+ (sopyu/aysopyu) ;)

Quote from: Ftxavanga Txe′lan on November 28, 2010, 07:17:45 AM
Concerning another way to teach the genitive, what do you exactly suggest? I'm not sure to understand what you mean. :) Is the topical case not in relation to another sentence, when we want to tell what happened to a particular pronoun in this concern ("as for")? Then I wouldn't really see how my three instances in Exercise 1 Part 2 would be perfect for that. If I'd explain the topical case, shouldn't I rather use sets of two sentences going together or something? Well, I'm just saying that, in fact I don't know really ahah. What do you think? :)

AFAIK, the topical has been recently appointed as the inalienable posessive marker, so things like body parts and the soul/spirit, and maybe even family members, are considered inalienable.

This might help avoid confusion with (say) an Ikran eating "the Ikran's heart" as if it were its meal, and "the Ikran's heart" inside of the Ikran, as a part of the Ikran.

If you still want to stick with the genitive that's fine.  I'm just saying that it might give fko a different image than you intend....

[img]http://swokaikran.skxawng.lu/sigbar/nwotd.php?p=2b[/img]

ÌTXTSTXRR!!

Srake serar le'Ìnglìsìa lì'fyayä aylì'ut?  Nari si älofoniru rutxe!!

Carborundum

Quote from: Sxkxawng alu 'Oma Tirea on November 29, 2010, 10:36:31 PM
According to NiaN, they're both right, just so long as you don't use ay+ with something that's not prefixed with ay+.
The thing is, as far as I can find, NiaN is the original source of this information. Not to bash on NeotrekkerZ, but they don't really have the authority to create rules like that.
Until Frommer says otherwise, it is safer to assume that moe lu karyu is about as grammatical as "we are teacher" would be in English.
We learn from our mistakes only if we are made aware of them.
If I make a mistake, please bring it to my attention for karma.

Ftxavanga Txe′lan

Quote from: Carborundum on November 30, 2010, 12:43:27 PMUntil Frommer says otherwise, it is safer to assume that moe lu karyu is about as grammatical as "we are teacher" would be in English.

This question is really ambiguous! :O

Then I'm going to let it with both the pronoun and the corresponding prefix, just in case the other version wouldn't be quite sure. Besides, this way it's also easier to understand the grammatical concept for the people who'll read the corrections to check up their answers. ^^