Prezi lessons

Started by Le'eylan, May 20, 2010, 09:26:00 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Carborundum

Quote from: Blue Elf on February 21, 2011, 05:09:33 PM
Omatikayaä is correct. If noun ends with a, ä, e, i or ì, it gets -yä suffix, but if ends with "ya" syllable, it gets only -ä suffix.
I'd like to see a quote from Dr. Frommer supporting that.
We learn from our mistakes only if we are made aware of them.
If I make a mistake, please bring it to my attention for karma.

'Oma Tirea

#201
Quote from: Blue Elf on February 21, 2011, 05:09:33 PM
Omatikayaä is correct. If noun ends with a, ä, e, i or ì, it gets -yä suffix, but if ends with "ya" syllable, it gets only -ä suffix.

Interesting speculation...

*investigates*

EDIT: consider a noun like fpìlfya or lì'fya, which only has the regular -yä suffix.  Maybe it only occurs to proper names...



[img]http://swokaikran.skxawng.lu/sigbar/nwotd.php?p=2b[/img]

ÌTXTSTXRR!!

Srake serar le'Ìnglìsìa lì'fyayä aylì'ut?  Nari si älofoniru rutxe!!

Blue Elf

Quote from: Sxkxawng alu 'Oma Tirea on February 21, 2011, 11:06:53 PM
EDIT: consider a noun like fpìlfya or lì'fya, which only has the regular -yä suffix.  Maybe it only occurs to proper names...
Yes, you are right, probably my grammar copy is outdated, changes occured during the time.... But Omatikayaä is considered to be an exception, I think it is still true
Oe lu skxawng skxakep. Slä oe nerume mi.
"Oe tasyätxaw ulte koren za'u oehu" (Limonádový Joe)


Plumps

I was searching high and low for the confirmation... Thanks to wm.annis, I found it again. It's HERE

Quote from: Frommer, March 2010One more inconsistency:

For bases in -a, the gen. was -yä in 3 cases (tompayä, Eywayä, tìska'ayä), but there was also Omatikayaä. I feel comfortable leaving that last word alone, as an exceptional form: *Omatikayayä doesn't seem stable--I can see yayä > yaä.

Le'eylan

Fixed that in NP8.
Added sìlpey and ätxäle as modal verbs, is that correct?
Krro krro pamrel seri fìtsengmì, alu oey pìlok leNa'vi
Sometimes writing here, on my Na'vi blog
=^● ⋏ ●^=

Maweyatan

Quote from: Le'eylan on February 23, 2011, 05:18:03 AM
Fixed that in NP8.
Added sìlpey and ätxäle as modal verbs, is that correct?

Hmmm...Sìlpey doesn't seem right to me. I thought the modal verbs were verbs that were followed by other verbs with the subjunctive. With sìlpey, tsnì is what gives the verbs followed by sìlpey the subjunctive.


Carborundum

#206
Quote from: Plumps on February 23, 2011, 04:30:27 AM
I was searching high and low for the confirmation... Thanks to wm.annis, I found it again. It's HERE

Quote from: Frommer, March 2010One more inconsistency:

For bases in -a, the gen. was -yä in 3 cases (tompayä, Eywayä, tìska'ayä), but there was also Omatikayaä. I feel comfortable leaving that last word alone, as an exceptional form: *Omatikayayä doesn't seem stable--I can see yayä > yaä.
Fantastic! Another mystery resolved. Thank you Plumps!

Quote from: Maweyatan on February 23, 2011, 05:40:05 AM
Quote from: Le'eylan on February 23, 2011, 05:18:03 AM
Fixed that in NP8.
Added sìlpey and ätxäle as modal verbs, is that correct?

Hmmm...Sìlpey doesn't seem right to me. I thought the modal verbs were verbs that were followed by other verbs with the subjunctive. With sìlpey, tsnì is what gives the verbs followed by sìlpey the subjunctive.

Sìlpey and ätxäle si are indeed not modal. However, tsnì is not the cause of the subjunctive in the verbs following. In his most recent blog post, Dr. Frommer writes:

QuoteSet srefey oe tsnì tsampongu tätxaw maw txon'ong.
'I'm currently expecting the war party back after nightfall.'

So the reason is actually that all examples of tsnì up until now also use optative mood, which is the real cause for the subjunctive infix.
We learn from our mistakes only if we are made aware of them.
If I make a mistake, please bring it to my attention for karma.

nuby1


'Oma Tirea

The -5 group (sì oe) found some keyey in NP #8 within the last hour:


[img]http://swokaikran.skxawng.lu/sigbar/nwotd.php?p=2b[/img]

ÌTXTSTXRR!!

Srake serar le'Ìnglìsìa lì'fyayä aylì'ut?  Nari si älofoniru rutxe!!

Le'eylan

Quote from: Sxkxawng alu 'Oma Tirea on March 18, 2011, 07:39:09 PM
Krro krro pamrel seri fìtsengmì, alu oey pìlok leNa'vi
Sometimes writing here, on my Na'vi blog
=^● ⋏ ●^=

'Oma Tirea

Quote from: Le'eylan on March 19, 2011, 08:59:57 AM
A general rule I have followed for modal verbs:
S Min Vin
S Min Vtr O-it
S Mtr Vin
S-ìl Mtr Vtr O-it
Tirea told me many many times that you don't use -l with new and another verb. Now I'm confused.
...and to add onto this confusion, lu fì'u amip :P I suspect new may actually be intransitive, slä nìngay oe ke omum.

Tatlam pìrezi tatsam...

[img]http://swokaikran.skxawng.lu/sigbar/nwotd.php?p=2b[/img]

ÌTXTSTXRR!!

Srake serar le'Ìnglìsìa lì'fyayä aylì'ut?  Nari si älofoniru rutxe!!

'Oma Tirea

Meanwhile...noticed this fìtrr...


[img]http://swokaikran.skxawng.lu/sigbar/nwotd.php?p=2b[/img]

ÌTXTSTXRR!!

Srake serar le'Ìnglìsìa lì'fyayä aylì'ut?  Nari si älofoniru rutxe!!

Le'eylan

Quote from: Sxkxawng alu 'Oma Tirea on March 19, 2011, 07:34:38 PM

Krro krro pamrel seri fìtsengmì, alu oey pìlok leNa'vi
Sometimes writing here, on my Na'vi blog
=^● ⋏ ●^=

Le'eylan

Krro krro pamrel seri fìtsengmì, alu oey pìlok leNa'vi
Sometimes writing here, on my Na'vi blog
=^● ⋏ ●^=

'Oma Tirea

Txantsan, na frakrr :)


[img]http://swokaikran.skxawng.lu/sigbar/nwotd.php?p=2b[/img]

ÌTXTSTXRR!!

Srake serar le'Ìnglìsìa lì'fyayä aylì'ut?  Nari si älofoniru rutxe!!

Le'eylan

Quote from: Inspirata on April 08, 2011, 11:44:51 PM
Txantsan, na frakrr :)



Thank you, as always.
I'm just a bit confused concerning this º... >__<
Krro krro pamrel seri fìtsengmì, alu oey pìlok leNa'vi
Sometimes writing here, on my Na'vi blog
=^● ⋏ ●^=

'Oma Tirea

Quote from: Le'eylan on April 09, 2011, 06:44:13 AM
I'm just a bit confused concerning this º... >__<

Basically, if it's by a number in Na'vi, it's an octal/Na'vi (base 8) number.  Otherwise the number is interpreted as decimal/'Rrtan (base 10).

[img]http://swokaikran.skxawng.lu/sigbar/nwotd.php?p=2b[/img]

ÌTXTSTXRR!!

Srake serar le'Ìnglìsìa lì'fyayä aylì'ut?  Nari si älofoniru rutxe!!

Blue Elf

Quote from: Inspirata on April 09, 2011, 11:33:16 PM
Quote from: Le'eylan on April 09, 2011, 06:44:13 AM
I'm just a bit confused concerning this º... >__<

Basically, if it's by a number in Na'vi, it's an octal/Na'vi (base 8 ) number.  Otherwise the number is interpreted as decimal/'Rrtan (base 10).
maybe better is to diferentiate base 8/ base10 numbers by 0 prefix (I don't know how to write º), as used by programmers (srane, oe lu hapxì feyä  :))
01 Na'vi(base 8 ) => 1 (base 10) 'aw
010 => 8 vol
012 => 10 volaw
020 => 16 mevol
0100 => 64 zam
etc.
Oe lu skxawng skxakep. Slä oe nerume mi.
"Oe tasyätxaw ulte koren za'u oehu" (Limonádový Joe)


'Oma Tirea

Quote from: Blue Elf on April 10, 2011, 09:58:32 AM
(I don't know how to write º)

ALT+0186 in Windows (ALT+0176 if you're so strict about the degree sign being used instead :P)

[img]http://swokaikran.skxawng.lu/sigbar/nwotd.php?p=2b[/img]

ÌTXTSTXRR!!

Srake serar le'Ìnglìsìa lì'fyayä aylì'ut?  Nari si älofoniru rutxe!!

Nongyu te Syulang Swokioang'itan

Wow, these are really good! Some of the words are kinda hard to guess, but I suppose difficulty is a part of a learning process :P Thank you fore these, they really are a boost for learning!
In the unwieldy situation of knowing way more grammar than vocab