Fìvospxìyä Aylì’fyavi Amip—This Month’s New Expressions, Pt. 2

[Blue Elf]

we have a new words! (bot is sleeping, srak?)
http://naviteri.org/2012/07/fivospxiya-aylifyavi-amip-this-months-new-expressions-pt-2/

[Kamean]

Amazing!

[Toruk Makto]

Silly bot. The thing never has really worked right. Thanks for staying on top of new naviteri posts!

Markì

[Swoka Swizaw]

Something that Paul didn't touch on...the <er> version of nrr. Is it NRR or NER? I'm for ner, honestly.

If vll was vol, then nrr will be ner.

[Tirea Aean]

Something that Paul didn't touch on...the <er> version of nrr. Is it NRR or NER? I'm for ner, honestly.

If vll was vol, then nrr will be ner.

I suspect nrr, given frrfen +er = frrfen.

[wm.annis]

I go with Temsko.  Based on vll, monosyllables with pseudo-vowels seem to act like unaccented pseudovowels in multi-syllablic verbs.

[Tirea Aean]

OH. right. ok I see what you mean. that makes sense.

[Swoka Swizaw]

OH. right. ok I see what you mean. that makes sense.

Yeah, plltxe, [pll.TXE], is poltxe and mllte, [mll.TE], is molte; this is all due to their unstressed pseudo-vowels. However, frrfen is stressed at the pseudo-vowel, so it sticks. Knowing all of this, I have actually come to like this rule...

['Oma Tirea]

I go with Temsko.  Based on vll, monosyllables with pseudo-vowels seem to act like unaccented pseudovowels in multi-syllablic verbs.

So perhaps vol from vll was not an exception as I had previously expected.