ake

Tirea Aean · August 03, 2011, 03:59:49 PM

Quote from: Blue Elf on August 03, 2011, 03:31:36 PM
Quote from: Tswusayona Tsamsiyu on August 03, 2011, 05:27:35 AM
Quote from: Blue Elf on August 03, 2011, 02:06:07 AM
Ke lu oeru aylì'u ake... lu txantsan nì'aw! Sunu oeru nìtxan, nga lu tsulfätu - kawtu ke tsun pivlltxe fwa fì'u ke lu tìngay!
what??
actually I also thought about the possibility of writing kea like that. it does look like ke transformed into an adjective. however, as far as I know, we don't do it.
Kea is adjective, so ake should be possible (we have it in Czech dictionary, although it is not present in "main" dictionary)
TBH I used this form intentionaly to see reactions Discussion is way how to make things clear - this form is not commonly used, so I'm curious if it is correct

we have kea. is ake a possible allomorph? I think it is, if one thinks of ke as a normal adjective (which is also able to be used as a negation adverb).

Thoughts?

Kemaweyan · August 03, 2011, 04:27:16 PM

No. Pawl said that it's impossible. Now I'll try to find that post...

Tirea Aean · August 03, 2011, 05:28:27 PM

Quote from: Kemaweyan on August 03, 2011, 04:27:16 PM
No. Pawl said that it's impossible. Now I'll try to find that post...

I THOUGHT there'd be a reason why he has NEVER used ake but always kea.

Great to see you again, ma Kemaweyan!

Kemaweyan · August 03, 2011, 05:41:20 PM

Quote from: Tirea Aean on August 03, 2011, 05:28:27 PM
I THOUGHT there'd be a reason why he has NEVER used ake but always kea.

I am sure that I saw this rule, but I can't find it now. Probably it was when he used kea first time and said that with nouns it should be kea, not just ke. But I can't find it

P.S. Oeru nìteng prrte' lu fwa tsun oe ngahu pivängkxo nìmun