Need someone to correct this...

[Eykyuan]

Kaltxì

I've translated

kelku si ngeyä tìrey
live your life

into Na'vi and I will be glad if someone can tell me if it's correct 'cause I'm not really certain about it.
I want to airbrush it onto my computer case thus a lot of work for a anyway wrong statement wouldn't be good.

Irayo

Eykyuan

[Payä Tìrol]

Kelku si is more "to live at, to dwell" etc.
So it'd be Rey ngeyä tìrey.

[Hawnuyu atxen]

Kaltxì!

Well, kelku si means live/dwell, so it's live at a place (i live in x - oe kelku si mì x), so here, it should be rey:
Rey ngeyä tìrey.

Though, i'd say that tìrey should be in the dative (the rey here is like it was used transitively, but it's an intransitive verb), so:
Rey ngeyä tìreyur.


(i only mention this in brackets, but it is also possible, that the nga should have the topical instead of the genitive, because it's your life that you should live... so maybe, again, maybe: "Rey ngari tìreyur.")

[kewnya txamew'itan]

Ma hawnuyu, we have no reason to believe that rey can take any objects whatsoever or, if it can, whether they would be accusative or dative.

What I'd do instead is use the adverbial phrase "nìfya'o tìreyä ngari" (the ngari has to come afterwards here so that the possessors all point in the same direction)

So I'd say "rey nìfya'o tìreyä ngari" a sentence like this makes fewer assumptions about how rey behaves and so is safer, but at the same time is much more verbose.

Note that I used ngari not ngeyä here because (as Hawnuyu was trying to explain), your life is an inalienable possession and so, whilst it is correct to use ngeyä, ngari is more idiomatic.

[Eykyuan]

Irayo for your replies, you really helped me.
I somehow ignored that kelku si means living at a place 
"rey nìfya'o tìreyä ngarì" is a bit bulky but even better than my solution!

Irayo!